Logo
Logo
burger
Logo
close
Xiomex

Xiomex

star
star
star
star
star
2.1 / 5.0
West Africa Trade Hub  /  Reviews  /  Xiomex
Xiomex

Xiomex

star
star
star
star
star
2.1 / 5.0

Xiomex Prop Firm Review

arrow

In this review of the Xiomex prop firm, we evaluate what the company promises to traders, how its accounts and funding claims compare with industry norms, and the key risks to understand before you trade or join.

Xiomex Broker Overview

arrow
AttributeDetails
Website 
Site AvailabilityOnline
AddressAl Quoz 1, Meydan Rd, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Dubai
Warning NoticesNot recommended by independent review sources such as Lycan Retrieve
Domain Blacklisted StatusNo clear evidence that the domain appears on a public blacklist

Xiomex presents itself as a proprietary trading firm and trader incubator, promoting funded accounts with no upfront fees. The brand is linked to Miralles SC Fz-Llc and cites a presence in Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates, positioning itself as a pathway to professional trading. Nevertheless, several cautionary signs warrant scrutiny:

Markets served:Xiomex appears to position itself as a multi-market trading and funding brand, commonly associated with areas such as forex, indices, commodities, equities, and crypto. However, the exact instrument list and trading conditions (symbols, leverage, spreads, commissions, and liquidity sources) are not consistently presented in a way that can be independently verified from the public-facing information referenced in this review.

AI-powered trading optimization platform:Xiomex promotes an “AI-powered” trading optimization concept, which typically implies automated analytics that monitor performance, flag rule breaches, and suggest risk adjustments (for example, position sizing, drawdown controls, or trade timing). In practice, these systems generally work by ingesting trading history and account metrics to produce dashboards, alerts, and rule-based recommendations. Specific model details, data inputs, and measurable outcomes are not clearly documented in the material reviewed here, so any AI claims should be treated as marketing until independently verified.

Funding programs and capital scaling:The firm’s marketing centers on access to funded accounts and the idea of progression to larger allocations. Common prop-style structures include an evaluation or verification step followed by a funded stage, with scaling tied to meeting profit and drawdown rules over time. Xiomex’s precise progression criteria, scaling thresholds, and profit-split terms are not presented with enough clarity in the reviewed sources to confirm how (or whether) scaling operates in practice.

Fees and account options:While Xiomex advertises “no upfront fees,” traders should still look for other costs that can affect results, such as spreads and commissions, platform or data fees, swap/financing charges, withdrawal fees, inactivity charges, or charges embedded in conversion and payout methods. The account types (for example, evaluation-style accounts versus instant-funding-style accounts) and the fee schedule per account type are not set out in a standardized, easily auditable format in the reviewed materials, so prospective users should request the full fee and rules sheet in writing before depositing funds or trading.

Training and support:As a “trader incubator,” Xiomex implies some form of trader development, which typically includes onboarding materials, risk-management guidance, performance reviews, and educational resources. The specific training library, coaching format (if any), and what support channels are actually available are not clearly substantiated by the information summarized in this review.

How to contact Xiomex:Contact options are typically presented through a website contact form and, where offered, an in-app help desk or ticket system. Publicly stated support hours and response-time commitments are not clearly specified in the reviewed information; if you reach out, ask for expected response times and keep a record of all correspondence.

Withdrawal experiences:Verifiable, consistent public feedback about withdrawals is limited in the sources referenced here. Where transparency is low, users should treat payout reliability as unproven until there is clear, independently confirmable evidence of routine withdrawals under stated terms.

Red Flags Identified

arrow
  • Low trust scores from external evaluators:External evaluators such as ScamAdviser and ScamDoc assign low credibility to subdomains like and , citing factors like redacted registrar data, very limited traffic signals, and association with high-risk financial services.
  • Domain anonymity and recent creation:ScamDoc indicates the site is relatively new and the registrant is undisclosed, a pattern frequently associated with platforms that are difficult to verify or hold accountable.
  • Cryptocurrency scam allegations:Reports from Gridinsoft mark as potentially unsafe and raise concerns consistent with fake investment pitches and phishing. These scenarios can lead to direct loss of funds, especially where payments are irreversible and dispute options are limited.
  • Concealed ownership:Ownership information remains obscured in Whois records, which can make it difficult to confirm who operates the firm, assess governance, or determine what recourse is available if something goes wrong.
  • Shared hosting risks:For a finance-oriented platform, shared hosting can increase technical exposure compared with dedicated infrastructure, including heightened risk of service disruption, data leaks, or security issues that impact account access.

Should You Trust Xiomex?

arrow

Based on the available evidence summarized above, Xiomex cannot be verified as a legitimate, reliably operated prop firm, and it should be treated as high risk until proven otherwise. Conduct independent due diligence and prioritize platforms that provide clear legal transparency, verifiable operating history, and well-defined client protections under recognized regulatory frameworks.

If you are looking for alternatives that many traders commonly regard as more established, examples often discussed in the prop-trading space include FTMO, Topstep, The5ers, and Earn2Trade. Typical trust criteria used by traders when comparing firms include operational track record, transparency of ownership and terms, clarity of payout rules, responsiveness of support, and the consistency of independent community feedback over time.

Recovering Lost Funds

arrow

If you face problems with a broker, consider the following actions to pursue resolution and protect your capital:

  • Report the issue to the competent financial regulator.
  • Consult a qualified recovery specialist or legal professional.
  • Save emails, chats, transaction receipts, and timelines.

Take Action Today

arrow

Do not wait if you suspect fraud. Start the recovery process promptly and follow the steps above. Acting early can help safeguard your finances.

comments
User Reviews About Xiomex
Share your honest review of Xiomex and help the crypto community make better-informed decisions. Your feedback directly shapes transparency and trust around this project.
Reviews 3
avatar
Auwalu musa

Auwalu musa

Feb 11, 2026 at 12:16

Auwalu musa

Feb 11, 2026 at 12:16

Reply
Musa Sani

Musa Sani

Feb 11, 2026 at 12:16

Musa Sani

Feb 11, 2026 at 12:16

Reply
Mr Carl Simcox

Mr Carl Simcox

Feb 10, 2026 at 04:18

Mr Carl Simcox

Feb 10, 2026 at 04:18

Reply